The FBI set up agent Hanssen with virtually no evidence. Why?
FBI agent Hanssen
The evidence presented by the FBI
all they had was a video of Hanssen walking into a public restroom in
the middle of the woods in Virginia. They have a picture of him walking
in. He has nothing in his hand. No papers. No briefcase. No containers.
The evidence that should have been presented by the FBI
Then the minute he walks out, the FBI arrest him. The FBI then goes back
to the mens room. In the trash barrel they say they find a milk container
stuffed full of classified documents. But they don't videotape it.
Then the FBI is seen taking apart the milk carton on the hood of the car,
so they don't even have any taped evidence to back up their claim that
classified documents were in the trash barrel. Then the video doesn't start
rolling again until Hanssen is in the back seat of the car.
In the FBI's own counterintelligence protocols for a controlled drop, which
was to get evidence to use in court, they're supposed to wait until the
suspect, in this case Hanssen, has not only dropped the documents but the
surveillance team is supposed to wait until his Russian handlers come to
get them, so they can be arrested as well. Since this was a double dead
drop site, which means that the money was at a different location than
the papers, the FBI should have waited for the suspect to go and collect
the money. They didn't wait to tape him going to the second site to pick
the money. Instead the FBI picked up the money ahead of time. Then
they used the same money to show on TV, part of the display presentation
for the media. Here's the money Hanssen supposedly got, and they show the
$50,000 in hundred dollar bills. The problem is Hanssen never got that
money. It was never in his hands.
Making the story look TOTALLY inconsistent
At the official FBI press conference on the arrest, details were added
to make sure everyone understood the story was totally manufactured.
Again, the only evidence they did show was a color still shot of the men's
room in the middle of the woods with nobody else in it. All the rest was
simply oral representation.
FBI Director Louis Freeh wasn't even clear as to what he was saying when
he stated that the FBI suddenly and mysteriously ended up with KGB documents
directly from Russia from a "friendly source." And that supposedly turned
them on to Hanssen? No Russian intelligence officer would have any vested
interest in giving documents to the FBI -- not unless they were sold. And
if the FBI had bought them. But that would be another matter altogether.
The FBI says they didn't buy them, that no money changed hands.
When Freeh was being questioned after his press conference by some reporters,
Freeh couldn't even remember what he had just said 40 minutes ago. So there
he was -- shuffling through papers, looking for the answers.
When Freeh was asked about Hanssen being questioned the night before, he
said that Hanssen didn't say anything. Then five minutes later, Freeh said
that Hanssen revealed how much money he had received. Then they changed
the statement again and said that No, he hadn't revealed that.
How did the FBI know how much money he had received? They searched
all his bank statements and couldn't find it. The FBI admitted that. They
said they searched all his financial records over the last fifteen years
and couldn't find anything out of the ordinary. The first statement was
that it was $600,000. Initially the FBI said it was $1.4 million. Then
they said it was $600,000 in cash and $800,000 in diamonds. How could they
know that? What the FBI hasn't said is that they haven't found any diamonds
anywhere in any safe deposit box. How could they have known that there
was another $800,000 on deposit in a bank in Moscow for Hanssen? It's not
even in Hanssen's name. They could not have possibly know that because
Hanssen's Russian handlers didn't even know his real name, or his position
in the government, or even what agency he worked for.
the FBI admitted that the information that Hanssen had passed to the Russians
over the years was information that the Russians knew about from other
sources. Why didn't the FBI do something with the information earlier?
And how could the FBI have known that Hanssen was passing along information
that the Russians already knew about from another source? The FBI claimed
that they had received this information eighteen months earlier. Furthermore,
Freeh stated that the FBI, through this information, had an "airtight case."
What changed from previous cases
If you think back to the Walker Case, the Pell Case, or the Howard Case,
you'll find they show the videotapes of everything right up front, during
the press conference. In this case they din't prove anything, not even
that Hanssen even put the documents there.
So, why ?
The puzzle is completed with the fact that
when you see this and wait for more Hanssen coverage or an explanation
for these glaring discrepancies and you get nothing - just like in the
recent case against Wen Ho Lee
the Department of Justice attempted to cobble together a case of some sort.
At the same time they exerted pressure to keep judicial proceedings surrounding
the case closed to the media. And they succeeded.
they were ready to execute an innocent (just like
McVeigh). But if an innocent declares to be guilty then they will eventually
save your life.
The answer is the same as for the question why
was this photo staged . To bring the message of terror to everyone.
The message that you are totally at the mercy of the antichrist.
Thanks to Al Martin for the facts. But he goes the wrong direction
with those facts ... July 6, 2001
